A refresher course
first though, Vedic Astrology uses a constellational way to measure zodiac
whereas Western Astrology uses the tropical zodiac.
Ancient Hindu
literature is full of myths that relate to zodiac signs, constellations (that
are known as Nakshatras in Hindi) and planets that explain a lot of
astrological rules. However, popular opinion suggests that these myths were
just methods that our ancient seers used to explain certain convoluted and intricate
physical laws, which were beyond the comprehension of common people.
Unfortunately even
though there has been much advancement is Modern Science it still has not been
able to fully understand those very physical laws behind this ancient and
revered method. The good news though is that we are getting there sooner than
later.
Our current
understanding of the Science of Astrology
stems from the study of statistics and probability. Statistics is that branch
of mathematics which deals with correlation between two or more seemingly
independent events without previously knowing the cause of that correlation.
For instance, if in a chart, 1000 people have the same astrological chart then
it can be seen that certain astrological rules hold true in 70-80% of them. So,
in statistical terms we can say that the incidence of a specific event in one's
life when certain planetary combination exists is "statistically significant".
Let us say that you
flip a coin 1000 times. Then the probability of "heads" is always
near to 50%. Now let us say that you observe the results of flipping a coin
during sunset and sunrise. If you find, after a yearlong test, that the
probability of "heads" coming up during sunrise is not actually 50%,
as was expected, but it’s 70%, then you can actually construct a rule that if
you flip a coin during sunrise, the chances of you getting a "heads"
will always be more.
Following that
particular stream of thought, Vedic astrology can be explained in a similar
manner. Certain combinations that are present in one's chart actually result in
a prediction that turns out to be correct in 70-80% of the charts that also
have that particular combination.
We might not be able to
explain as to why it happens, yet, but the evidence in front of us is pretty
consistent that events can be predicted with very logical statistical
significance.
No comments:
Post a Comment